we should all chip in a water molecule or two and the second author becomes 
"the CCP4 community"….

On 27 Mar 2013, at 17:22, Antony Oliver <[email protected]>
 wrote:

> At the risk of being somewhat cheeky - perhaps I could claim second author?
> I too have successfully solved the structure - and I totally concur with Phil.
> Placing a second molecule in the asymmetric unit, essentially resolves the 
> perceived R-factor problem.
> 
> A good thorough manual inspection and rebuilding is *ALWAYS* good practice 
> for newcomers to the field.
> 
> Tony.
> 
> 
> On 27 Mar 2013, at 17:14, Petr Leiman <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
>> Since this is now public domain knowledge and if this gets ever published, 
>> Phil has my vote to be the first author!
>> 
>> Petr
>> 
>> 
>> On Mar 27, 2013, at 6:09 PM, Phil Jeffrey wrote:
>> 
>>> That's quite brave - shipping your entire structure to people that could be 
>>> actual competitors.  But it was fun to play at 1.4 Angstrom over lunch.
>>> 
>>> Practical points:
>>> 
>>> * not everyone loves 12Mb of attachments in one email in their inbox, so if 
>>> you do this again please put the files on a webserver and point us there
>>> 
>>> Structural points:
>>> 
>>> * the map looks pretty good, but I think the sequence is misassigned in 
>>> some regions (e.g. A118-A122 etc).  Automation is a good tool but a poor 
>>> master, and extreme caution is required before taking the results too 
>>> literally.  Usually you'd expect a 1.4 Angstrom to be easy to autobuild but 
>>> I recently had a sequence misassignment at just that resolution. That map 
>>> was trivial to interpret with the correct sequence however - one of the 
>>> joys of working with Arp/wArp at 1.4 Angstrom.
>>> 
>>> * the large number of positive difference density blobs and water molecules 
>>> clustered in what otherwise would be the solvent void strongly suggest that 
>>> there's a second molecule present.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> If I take redfluorescentprotein_refine_10.pdb (waters removed) and 
>>> exptl_fobs_phases_freeR_flags.mtz and ask Phaser to look for two molecules, 
>>> it finds them quite successfully.  (for the record an LLG of 15111 using 
>>> nominal sequence identity of 90%).  I will send this to you off-list.  
>>> Please note that Phaser is using a different origin for this molecular 
>>> replacement solution so the coordinates and your previous map do not 
>>> overlap.
>>> 
>>> This rather nicely explains why your structure had an R-factor in the 40's 
>>> despite being a half-way decent model.  The new MR solution has an R-free 
>>> in the 30's in the phenix.refine job I'm running right now.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Going forward I suggest you utilize the Arp/wArp program to autobuild your 
>>> structure for you, starting from the molecular replacement solution (or, 
>>> perhaps with it stripped to ALA).  While you could use Autobuild, this is 
>>> the CCP4 list and so you should use CCP4 programs.
>>> 
>>> Phil Jeffrey
>>> Princeton
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 3/27/13 12:22 PM, Tom Van den Bergh wrote:
>>>> Dear members of ccp4bb,
>>>> 
>>>> I need some help with the refinement of my structure of a variant of
>>>> mRFP (monomer red fluorescent protein, sequence in attachment). I have
>>>> done molecular replacement with phaser with model 2VAD of protein
>>>> database. Then i have done some model building phenix.autobuild. (2
>>>> pdb's (overall...), freeR flags and log file attached) When i refine
>>>> with phenix.refine my structure i get a R-value of 0,42 which is still
>>>> way too high. (redfluorescent protein.pdb, .mtz and logfile attached)
>>>> When i look at the structure in coot i find many unmodelled blobs and
>>>> many outliers in density analysis and rotamer analysis. The problem is
>>>> that there are so many problems with my structure, that i dont know
>>>> where to begin. Could you try some refinement for me, because this is
>>>> first structure that i need to solve as a student and i dont have too
>>>> many experience with it.
>>>> 
>>>> Greetings,
>>>> 
>>>> Tom
>>>> 
> 

Roberto A. Steiner
Group Leader
Randall Division of Cell and Molecular Biophysics
King's College London
[email protected]

Room 3.10A
New Hunt's House
Guy's Campus
SE1 1UL
London

Phone 0044 20 78488216
Fax    0044 20 78486435

Reply via email to