Hi, Colin,





... I've been carrying a (very beaten up) 5'' x 3'' (April 1986) edition of the 
LBL ‘X-ray Data Booklet’ around in my briefcase for the past ¼ century or more. 
 (An invaluable reference work.)  So, I’m most pleased to follow the link that 
you refer to now, to the online version.  What progress.  Fantastic !!  
Definitely, though, I’ll not forsake this here little book.





Many Thanks and Very Best Regards,



Marcus.





-----Original Message-----
From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of Colin Nave
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 3:03 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] proton scattering by X-rays



Hi Tim

Although my SHELX comment was in jest, your point illustrates the programs 
versatility. You are also right about the flat(ish) form factor for the proton.

To get to a resolution where there is a cross over would require a very short 
wavelength. Other processes would then dominate. A nice source for this is the 
x-ray data booklet from LBL, in particular the chapter on scattering of x-rays 
from electrons and atoms.

http://xdb.lbl.gov/Section3/Sec_3-1.html

Interestingly fig 3-1 in this does not include coherent scattering from nuclei 
presumably because it is negligible compared with the other processes - in 
practice Ian was correct in saying that a proton is effectively invisible to 
x-rays of the energy we usually use.



Colin





-----Original Message-----

From: Tim Gruene [mailto:t...@shelx.uni-ac.gwdg.de]

Sent: 02 February 2015 22:08

To: Nave, Colin (DLSLtd,RAL,LSCI); ccp4bb

Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] proton scattering by X-rays



Hi Colin,



you can add f' for every atom type in SHELXL yourself, so in that sense, it has 
been incorporated in SHELX. Bear in mind that the nucleus is point-like to 
X-rays at ordinary wavelengths so that it should not have a form factor like 
the electron cloud but a constant scattering length - just as they do for 
neutron scattering.



You can do the maths at what resolution the form factor and the constant

1:1860 scattering length contribution cross. It is not ridiculously small but 
nowhere near 0.8A. Charge density people may need to take this into account, 
but I don't know if they do.



Cheers,

Tim



On 02/02/2015 04:03 PM, Colin Nave wrote:

> “As you say the proton itself is invisible to X-rays.”

> Not quite! The ratio of scattering between electrons and protons should go as 
> the inverse square of the masses.

> Ratio of mass 1:1860, ratio of scattering 1:3459600. A small correction but 
> doubtless it has been incorporated in to SHELX.

> Colin

>

>

> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK] On Behalf Of

> Ian Tickle

> Sent: 02 February 2015 13:35

> To: ccp4bb

> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] proton scattering by X-rays

>

>

> Peter, if it's a covalently-bonded H atom it surely can't be a bare proton, 
> it must have at least some partial electron around it for the (possibly 
> partial) covalent bond, enough to diffract X-rays anyway.  As you say the 
> proton itself is invisible to X-rays.

> Cheers

> -- Ian

>

> On 2 February 2015 at 13:08, Peter Moody 
> <pcem1bigfi...@gmail.com<mailto:pcem1bigfi...@gmail.com<mailto:pcem1bigfi...@gmail.com%3cmailto:pcem1bigfi...@gmail.com>>>
>  wrote:

> Dear BB

>

> I have (again) realised how limited by understanding of our subject is.

>

> In Nature’s online site 
> http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature14110.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20150129
>  there is a paper describing an X-ray structure determined with sub-atomic 
> data (nice!).  The figures show density for H+ as well as H-. In my simple 
> way I had assumed that any X-ray scattering from the nucleus was negligible, 
> and that the electrons are responsible for this. I would expect a proton 
> (i.e. H+) alone to be invisible to X-rays, and certainly not to look similar 
> to a hydride (with two electrons in (electron density) maps. What have I 
> missed?  Could someone please explain, or point me to a suitable reference?

>

> Best wishes, Peter

> (please use 
> peter.mo...@le.ac.uk<mailto:peter.mo...@le.ac.uk<mailto:peter.mo...@le.ac.uk%3cmailto:peter.mo...@le.ac.uk>>
>  to reply

> directly)

>

> http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/biochemistry/staff/moody

>

>

>



--

Dr Tim Gruene

Institut fuer anorganische Chemie

Tammannstr. 4

D-37077 Goettingen



GPG Key ID = A46BEE1A





--

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or 
privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you 
are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee 
please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, 
retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.

Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not 
necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.

Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments 
are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you 
may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with 
the message.

Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and 
Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and 
Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom

Reply via email to