Dear all -

I have also had success with crystallization above room temperature.  I once 
grew diffracting crystals of a small, thermostable enzyme by incubating the 
plates in a 37°C bacterial culture incubator, and despite similar reservoir 
conditions, these high-temperature crystals grew in a different crystal form 
from those of the same enzyme at room temperature.  To harvest and freeze, I 
opted to keep the plate warm in case I wanted to go back to it later (and to 
prevent condensation on the cover slips), so I set up a small humidifier next 
to the stereo microscope, mounted a heat gun across the bench set to the lowest 
setting, and adjusted the distance until a thermometer mounted near the 
microscope stage indicated a stable 37°C.  It was low-tech, but it worked well 
enough.

Cheers,
Jared



On August 2, 2019 at 4:48:06 AM, Pierre Rizkallah ([email protected]) 
wrote:

Hi Everyone,

 

Look up J Mol Biol 270 724-738 (Valegard et al.), or doi 
https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1997.1144 , PDB entry 1ZDH, where the M&M section 
describes crystallising MS2 virus at 37C. From memory, as they were collecting 
data at Daresbury during my time there, the crystals were in a gel, after 
bringing the set up to RT. It helped them a great deal, because then they could 
cut out the gel and orient the crystals favourably from knowledge of the 
morphology. That was way before cryo-cooling was available, and a complete data 
set collection used to require lots of crystals. It helped to know where the 
gaps in the rotation range were.

 

Although I haven’t done any experiment at a temp higher than RT, I expect that 
if you get crystals at a higher temp, then you would likely have them better 
ordered as you ‘cool’ them down to RT. There is an added advantage in creature 
comfort without compromising the precious little crystals. Win-win?

 

Pierre

*******************************************************

Dr Pierre Rizkallah, Senior Lecturer Structural Biology

Institute of Infection & Immunology, Sir Geraint Evans Building, 

School of Medicine, Heath Campus, Cardiff, CF14 4XN

email: [email protected]        phone: +44 29 2074 2248

http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/people/view/126690-rizkallah-pierre

 

From: CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Newman, Janet 
(Manufacturing, Parkville)
Sent: 01 August 2019 23:30
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Importance of temperature during initial crystallization 
screening

 

Interesting topic,

 

Certainly the two papers suggested by Georg are relevant, and I fully agree 
with the comments from Daniel that it is hard to predict the behaviour of any 
given protein from a statistical analysis of proteins in general.

 

I find it interesting that even with the use of incubators to store and image 
crystal experiments (which takes away the issue of setting up plates in the 
cold) we still find that our facility users have a strong bias towards 20C over 
8C – for example, our standard initial screen (Shotgun) has been set up just 
over 360 times in the last year, 216 times at 20C and 135 times at 8C. It is 
equally easy to type “20” or “8” into the request for the plate storage 
temperature, so its not ease of crystallisation setup which dictates this. It 
might well be that the thought of harvesting crystals from cold plates puts 
people off the lower temperature?

 

A quick search through our database shows that of the shotgun screens that were 
set up in the last year, 51% of those set up at 20C were (human) scored as 
containing crystals, and 47% of those set up at 8C were (human) scored as 
containing crystals. So the rate of crystal formation at the two temperature is 
essentially the same.

Patrick, I can’t comment on “unusual” temperatures, as I don’t have any 
significant experience with going outside the 4-20 region.

 

Cheers, Janet

 

 

From: CCP4 bulletin board <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Georg Mlynek
Sent: Friday, 2 August 2019 5:09 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Importance of temperature during initial crystallization 
screening

 

Hi Sergei, this publication should be useful for you.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4756611/

Additionally it is proposed that when your protein is not so stable (lower Tm), 
one should incubate the screens at 4C.

http://scripts.iucr.org/cgi-bin/paper?S0907444911036225

Br, Georg.

 

Am 2019-08-01 um 2:54 PM schrieb Patrick Shaw Stewart:

 

Hi Sergei

 

We did some data-mining on this way, way back, in 2004.

 

See the second section in this link

 

https://www.douglas.co.uk/PDB_data.htm  

 

When you consider the non-standard temps - ie NOT 4C or 20C - it looks as 
though the higher-end temps may work better.  But of course it's hard to make 
sense of the results of a martingale.

 

Thx Patrick

 

PS Janet (Newman) do you have anything more up-to-date on this?

 

 

 

On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 10:24 AM Sergei Strelkov <[email protected]> 
wrote:

Dear all,

 

I wondered if someone could point me to a recent study on the importance of 
temperature during initial search for crystallization conditions. It would be 
interesting to see any real statistics on this subject.

 

We typically try to perform screening at at two temperatures, such as 
duplicating a given kit screen at 20C and 4C if there is enough sample. My 'gut 
feeling' is that this is not as important as sampling the chemical space though.

 

Thank you!

Sergei

 

Prof. Sergei V. Strelkov Laboratory for Biocrystallography Department of 
Pharmaceutical Sciences, KU Leuven O&N2, Campus Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49 bus 
822, 3000 Leuven, Belgium Phone: +32 16 33 08 45, mobile: +32 486 29 41 32 Lab 
pages: http://pharm.kuleuven.be/Biocrystallography
 

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1



 

--

 [email protected]    Douglas Instruments Ltd.
 Douglas House, East Garston, Hungerford, Berkshire, RG17 7HD, UK
 Directors: Peter Baldock, Patrick Shaw Stewart

 http://www.douglas.co.uk
 Tel: 44 (0) 148-864-9090    US toll-free 1-877-225-2034
 Regd. England 2177994, VAT Reg. GB 480 7371 36



 

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

 

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

 

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1


To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the CCP4BB list, click the following link:
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?SUBED1=CCP4BB&A=1

Reply via email to