On 1/16/20 7:34 PM, Brian Cole wrote: > It wouldn't just be wayland support in motif. Even if we had > wayland+motif working /now/, it would only help with applications. CDE > is fundamentally a X11 window manager, and X11 window managers are a > tiny part of the equivalent in wayland. Wayland, for... better or > worse... has "compositors" in that space, which are basically window > manager + most of what the X server did + I think some other stuff > (input management, for instance). There are things like wlroots, a > library for a lot of those parts, but you're still talking about > something way bigger than what a X11 wm ever needed to do. >
I agree - it a different paradigm. CDE would only work on wayland via Xwayland. -jon > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020, at 8:27 PM, Vladimir Nikishkin wrote: >> How much job would be implementing support for Wayland in Motif? >> >> Christopher Turkel <turkel.christop...@gmail.com >> <mailto:turkel.christop...@gmail.com>> 於 2020年1月17日 週五 09:18 寫道： >> >> I don’t care about dtbuilder, but dtmail is not very useful. >> >> On Thursday, January 16, 2020, Chase via cdesktopenv-devel >> <cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> <mailto:cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> wrote: >> >> I guess I'll take the silence as a no to my previous >> question, though as a programmer I was never good at taking >> social queues haha. >> >> I feel like the same could be said for this entire project, >> especially with wayland right around the corner, but people >> still like their niches. We should keep in mind that this is >> a historical project, and I think that removing things that >> could be fixed and that had a purpose within the desktop >> would be a disservice. >> >> Thank you for your time, >> -Chase >> >> >> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ >> On Wednesday, January 15, 2020 7:26 PM, Jon Trulson >> <j...@radscan.com <mailto:j...@radscan.com>> wrote: >> >>> On 1/15/20 5:41 PM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: >>> >>>> I think I once compiled a non-recent version of open-source CDE >>>> for Solaris 11 (SPARC), and it mostly worked, although dtmail was >>>> definitely unusable. >>> >>> dtmail is useless. So much work would need to go into it >>> ,to bring it up to modern standards, and I don't see anyone >>> stepping up to do it. >>> >>> I would like to 'retire' it. >>> >>> dtappbuilder is another one that seemed cool at the time, >>> but who uses it? Who */would/* use it today if it worked well? >>> >>> That's another one I'd like to 'retire'. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Jon Trulson >>> >>> "Entropy. It isn't what it used to be." >>> -- Sheldon >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cdesktopenv-devel mailing list >> cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> <mailto:cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cdesktopenv-devel mailing list >> cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > cdesktopenv-devel mailing list > cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel -- Jon Trulson "Entropy. It isn't what it used to be." -- Sheldon
_______________________________________________ cdesktopenv-devel mailing list cdesktopenv-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdesktopenv-devel
