On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:25:47PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > >From: Matthias Riese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> >> I would never recommend unmaintained software that is known not to > >> >> work correctly for many drives - see the mailing lists for this "project". > >> > >> >Wrong. > > >> -> The "project" you mention is definitely unmaintained The only changes are > >> related to useless changes in the nonstandard make system used by > >> this project. > > >Wrong. > > >1. The changes are not useless. > >2. You contradict yourself wrt to the state of maintenance. > > Wrong: > > The only thing Mr. Rosenkranzer did was to replace a make system that is known > to work by a broken make system and later start trying to fix his broken make > system. This cannot be called maintenance of the project (as it was not needed > at all) but hobbyists work...
You mean: A make system that is know to work for THIS case with a make system that is know to work for nearly all other OSS-projects. I only say Tannenbaum 'Linux is obsolete'. Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
