Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >From: Matthias Riese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >> >> I would never recommend unmaintained software that is known not to > >> >> work correctly for many drives - see the mailing lists for this "project". > >> > >> >Wrong. > > >> -> The "project" you mention is definitely unmaintained The only changes are > >> related to useless changes in the nonstandard make system used by > >> this project. > > >Wrong. > > >1. The changes are not useless. > >2. You contradict yourself wrt to the state of maintenance. > > Wrong: > > The only thing Mr. Rosenkranzer did was to replace a make system that is known > to work by a broken make system and later start trying to fix his broken make > system. This cannot be called maintenance of the project (as it was not needed > at all) but hobbyists work...
Wrong. Disesteeming the work of other people does not prove anything you claim. And the interest of lost of people in the project proves the contrary wrt to the need for the project. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
