On Thu 9 January 2003 22:21, Matthias Riese wrote: > Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >From: Matthias Riese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >> >> I would never recommend unmaintained software that is > > >> >> known not to work correctly for many drives - see the > > >> >> mailing lists for this "project". > > >> > > > >> >Wrong. > > >> > > >> -> The "project" you mention is definitely unmaintained The > > >> only changes are related to useless changes in the > > >> nonstandard make system used by this project. > > > > > >Wrong. > > > > > >1. The changes are not useless. > > >2. You contradict yourself wrt to the state of maintenance. > > > > Wrong: > > > > The only thing Mr. Rosenkranzer did was to replace a make > > system that is known to work by a broken make system and later > > start trying to fix his broken make system. This cannot be > > called maintenance of the project (as it was not needed at all) > > but hobbyists work... > > Wrong. > > Disesteeming the work of other people does not prove anything you > claim. And the interest of lost of people in the project proves > the contrary wrt to the need for the project.
Will you people stop wasting time and bandwidth? You're never going to convince one another anyway. Lourens -- GPG public key: http://home.student.utwente.nl/l.e.veen/lourens.key -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
