Peter Hunter wrote: It may be that the additional key words > should adhere to terms from an ontology as Matt suggests and should use the > predictive completion facility that Andre suggests.
Will we use the Physiome ontology for this? It will require changing the current keywords that are defined in the metadata for many of the models so they fit an ontology. Should we be using ontology terms for the major categories as well? A quick flick through the Physiome ontology suggests that we might have trouble finding terms in it that would fit what we want. _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
