Hi Andrew, I don't know for the others, but in my case it would certainly help me understand your document better and, hopefully, provide you with more useful feedback, if you were to give us some concrete examples of the type of models that your specification document targets.
I appreciate that your document is 'only' a specification document and this is why I am not suggesting to have those examples as part of the specifications, just as a side document to help the readers/reviewers. Alan > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:cellml-discussion- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrew Miller > Sent: 29 May 2012 01:28 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [cellml-discussion] New draft secondary specification: Uncertainty > > Hi all, > > I've just put up a draft secondary specification on how we could represent > parameter uncertainty within the context of my CellML 1.2 draft. > > The secondary specification can be viewed here: > http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/draft-secondary-spec-uncertainty/ > The DocBook it is generated from can be checked out here: > https://github.com/A1kmm/cellml-uncertainty-secondary > > It is written against this draft CellML 1.2 specification: > > http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/draft-normative-spec-andrews- > preferred/ > It builds upon, and refers to, the draft secondary specification for models of > differential-algebraic equations with optional events, available here: > http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/draft-secondary-spec-dae-events > > Best wishes, > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > cellml-discussion mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
