Dear all,

I'm glad to see uncertainty being taken into acount in cell models. Perhaps it would be worthwhile to add the scenario where no assumptions are made about the uncertainty and a parameter value is simply given by its upper and lower bounds.

kind regards,
  Michael

On 05/29/2012 01:28 AM, Andrew Miller wrote:
Hi all,

I've just put up a draft secondary specification on how we could represent parameter uncertainty within the context of my CellML 1.2 draft.

The secondary specification can be viewed here:
  http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/draft-secondary-spec-uncertainty/
The DocBook it is generated from can be checked out here:
  https://github.com/A1kmm/cellml-uncertainty-secondary

It is written against this draft CellML 1.2 specification:
http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/draft-normative-spec-andrews-preferred/ It builds upon, and refers to, the draft secondary specification for models of differential-algebraic equations with optional events, available here:
  http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/draft-secondary-spec-dae-events

Best wishes,
Andrew

_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion

_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
cellml-discussion@cellml.org
http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion

Reply via email to