Dear all,
I'm glad to see uncertainty being taken into acount in cell models.
Perhaps it would be worthwhile to add the scenario where no assumptions
are made about the uncertainty and a parameter value is simply given by
its upper and lower bounds.
kind regards,
Michael
On 05/29/2012 01:28 AM, Andrew Miller wrote:
Hi all,
I've just put up a draft secondary specification on how we could
represent parameter uncertainty within the context of my CellML 1.2
draft.
The secondary specification can be viewed here:
http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/draft-secondary-spec-uncertainty/
The DocBook it is generated from can be checked out here:
https://github.com/A1kmm/cellml-uncertainty-secondary
It is written against this draft CellML 1.2 specification:
http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/draft-normative-spec-andrews-preferred/
It builds upon, and refers to, the draft secondary specification for
models of differential-algebraic equations with optional events,
available here:
http://www.cellml.org/Members/miller/draft-secondary-spec-dae-events
Best wishes,
Andrew
_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
_______________________________________________
cellml-discussion mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
