Hi Dave, hi List,
On Jun 28, 2015, at 20:04 , Dave Taht <[email protected]> wrote:
> htb + cake is the wrong configuration. :)
“Wrong” might be a bit hard, but certainly not the preferred solution.
During my tests on your box simple.qos resulted in the following:
root@davedesk2:/usr/lib/sqm# tc -d qdisc
qdisc fq_codel 0: dev eth0 root refcnt 2 limit 1024p flows 1024 quantum 300
target 5.0ms interval 100.0ms ecn
qdisc cake 8030: dev eth1 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 4500Kbit diffserv4 flows raw
qdisc ingress ffff: dev eth1 parent ffff:fff1 ----------------
qdisc cake 8031: dev ifb4eth1 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 45Mbit besteffort flows
atm overhead 0
qdisc bfifo 800b: dev wlan1 root refcnt 5 limit 16Kb
qdisc cake 8008: dev wlan0 root refcnt 5 unlimited diffserv4 flows raw
So either I mixed things up later or Mikael’s simple.qos somehow got stale.
Anyway, there is work thee for me to do to fix this up properly.
Best Regards
Sebastian
>
> cake has an integral bandwidth limiter and diffserv, there should be
> no htb here and it looked like their was. I have only been using the
> "simplest" qdisc, possibly the script for the simple qdisc is wrong?
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Jonathan Morton <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> To be honest, HTB + cake isn't really the preferred configuration.
>>
>> - Jonathan Morton
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> worldwide bufferbloat report:
> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat
> And:
> What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast
> _______________________________________________
> Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
_______________________________________________
Cerowrt-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel
