> > According to the editorial, some estimates are that it would > > cost the USA as much as $400 billion in lost GDP, > >Sorry just had to chime in here. IMHO, any statistics used in an editorial >or coming out of a politicians mouth should immediately be questioned. Yes, those cost estimates should be questioned. Since those are the figures calculated by the Clinton administration, which fought for Kyoto(however briefly), it is most likely that they are too low. Dave Fobare ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
- RE: Hiyas! :) Ang�l Stewart
- RE: Hiyas! :) Kevin Gilchrist
- Re: Hiyas! :) eric . laney
- Re: Hiyas! :) Wayne Putterill
- Re: Hiyas! :) Lee
- Re: Hiyas! :) Jennifer
- Re: Hiyas! :) Lee
- Re: Hiyas! :) eric . laney
- Re: Hiyas! :) Dave Fobare
- Kyoto and global warming (was: RE: Hiyas! :)) Cameron Childress
- RE: Kyoto and global warming (was: RE: Hiyas! ... Dave Fobare
- RE: Kyoto and global warming (was: RE: Hiyas! ... howard
- Re: Kyoto and global warming (was: RE: Hiy... Wayne Putterill
- RE: Kyoto and global warming (was: RE:... howard
- Re: Kyoto and global warming (was... Wayne Putterill
- RE: Kyoto and global warming ... howard
- RE: Kyoto and global warming ... Angel Stewart
- Re: Hiyas! :) Lee
- RE: Hiyas! :) Cameron Childress
- RE: Hiyas! :) Dave Fobare
- Re: Hiyas! :) Wayne Putterill
