You know, one of the ironies of this thread is how it totally overlooks what
money grubbers the environmental groups are.
Talk about greed.
Why is it that you think you only hear the BAD things from environmental
groups and never hear all that has been accomplished over the last several
decades to improve air and water quality? Why, because anything that
diminishes public fear over "global warming" hurts environmental groups
where it hurts the most -- in the pocketbooks.
You'll never get a balanced report on environmental issues from
environmental groups because it's not in their best interest to be fair,
objective and balanced. If they tell the truth, people will stop donate to
their causes. Without money, their directors can't afford their BMWs.
Sure the oil companies are greedy bastards. And their are a lot of evil men
in the corporate board rooms around the world. But environmental leaders
aren't exactly saints, either.
Think about that the next time you hear some environmental group trying to
scare you shitless.
H.
-----Original Message-----
From: Cameron Childress [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 12:59 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Kyoto and global warming (was: RE: Hiyas! :))
> According to the editorial, some estimates are that it would
> cost the USA as much as $400 billion in lost GDP,
Sorry just had to chime in here. IMHO, any statistics used in an editorial
or coming out of a politicians mouth should immediately be questioned.
Any organization who spends virtually all of it's resources on promoting
fossil fuel solutions and none on exploring and/or promoting renewable does
not have the human species' best interest in mind.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
