That is what I understand to be the case.
At 02:54 PM 8/28/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>arg! i thought it was part of the 2000 taxes....
>what if a person is not getting anything back in 2001.....or owes? would
>they then have to pay this back too??
><grumble grumble>
>~~
>Stephenie Hamilton
>Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Professional
>http://coldfusionwebs.com
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 2:44 PM
>Subject: Re: Bushwacked again
>
>
> > It is not income, it is an advance on what you should be getting back come
> > April 15th.
> >
> >
> > At 02:15 PM 8/28/2001 -0400, you wrote:
> > >ack! wait, are you saying we have to count this check as income??
> > >** noooooooooo **
> > >~~
> > >Stephenie Hamilton
> > >Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Professional
> > >http://coldfusionwebs.com
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 11:19 AM
> > >Subject: RE: Bushwacked again
> > >
> > >
> > > > Year is the other thing. It is not a Tax rebate. It is a tax advance.
>Come
> > > > April 15th you will find that there was a catch. This was the
>Democratic
> > > > Compromise.
> > > >
> > > > The way it was figured if you got one of these checks then your taxes
> > > > should go down enough to cover that check. So I got $300, yesterday as
>a
> > > > matter of fact, and now come April 15th when I fill out my 1040 form I
> > >will
> > > > declare that check and poof my rebate will drop by $300.
> > > >
> > > > Read more about it here:
> > > > http://detnews.com/2001/politics/0107/26/-254330.htm
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > At 08:05 AM 8/28/2001 -0700, you wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >To get this thread back on topic ...
> > > > >
> > > > >Yup, just further evidence that GW is the biggest horses a.. to sit
>in
> > >the
> > > > >Oval Office in modern times.
> > > > >
> > > > >As I've said before, the tax cut (really, a rebate), was the most
> > > > >lame-brained scheme imaginable. It isn't sound economics. It isn't
> > > > >conservative. It isn't smart. And in the end, I think it will prove
>to be
> > > > >stupid politically as well.
> > > > >
> > > > >H.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >-----Original Message-----
> > > > >From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > >Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 7:05 AM
> > > > >To: CF-Community
> > > > >Subject: Bushwacked again
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >The tax cut that got GW elected (yes Virginia, it was a ploy to get
> > >elected)
> > > > >forces the governmet to dip into social security
> > > > >(hmmmm - didn't someone named Al Gore predict this during the
>election
> > > > >campaign?).
> > > > >
> > > > >http://www.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/08/28/budget/index.html
> > > > >
> > > > >Howie
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
