Well said...
Howie
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:20 AM
Subject: RE: Bushwacked again
>
>
>
> This is nonsense because historically, the Republicans have spent more than
> the Democrats. Look at the monster deficits Reagan ran up -- and he would
> have spent more if the Democrats in Congress hadn't stopped him.
>
> If Gore were president, we probably would have had much what we had under
> Clinton -- smaller government, less spending, better economy.
>
> You can't argue with success and under Clinton, we had the first president
> since Ike who didn't deficit spend -- we had government jobs cut for the
> first time since Ike -- we had real wages rise (when adjusted for inflation)
> for the first time since Ike. And Gore is more naturally conservative
> fiscally than Clinton.
>
> And I don't see nobody handing me thousands of dollars, etc.
>
> H.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 8:47 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Bushwacked again
>
>
> That's complete nonsense. The guy hands you thousands of dollars, possibly
> tens of thousands or more (add another 0, over ten years) if you factor in
> what would have happened with Gore as president; money that would have been
> pissed into a hole and you and the Democrats find ways to criticize it.
> Amazing but true. The Democrats are mad because reduced spending equals
> reduced power for them. They don't get to dole out more of your money, you
> do. What a novel concept.
>
> Lee
>
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
