view" or any view at all. If their mind was already made up, what would be the
point of the interview? A public Flogging?
Talk show hosts are classified as Entertainers, not journalists. As expected,
they can take license with facts. And they can be counted on to be one-sided.
As I posted before, these self-styled people are all in a tizzy because they
cannot refute the facts that are reported in the movie, so they, instead attack
the man. You are free to choose any side you wish. This debate is about the
supporting facts, as MM's goal is not in question.
Again, Moore is up front about his thoughts about Bush & Co. but the difference
is that he produced historical facts to support his position.
Actually, I suggest you go and see the movie. Take with you your opinion that
has already been formed and allow yourself to be entertained. Then you can
enter into a debate over the facts as opposed to the man. You do not have to
like MM, in fact I doubt many do. But his facts are not made up.
Doug
----- Original
Tim Russert is not a Journalist? What definition of
journalist are you using?
Granted the others are not journalist and don't claim
to be. I just said I thought it would be nice to be
interviewed by a conservative, someone who has
opposing views so it wouldn't be one sided.
sm
> Those aren't journalists. They are talk show hosts.
> Also how about
> someone with integrity, which given Rush's
> proclivities, Hannity's
> deliberate fabrications, and O'reilly's outright
> lies, makes your list
> rather short.
>
> larry
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
