Your analogy does not exactly support the point you were trying to make.
That was what I responded to.
Also I do not understand this statement, it seems contradictory:
"But yes i agree they would die out but maybe this is part of gods plan
to let the gays exist"
It seems that logically it would mean it is god's plan to ensure that
the homosexual animals do not exist past the initial point of
aberration.
Please note, that this is all with respect to the specific analogy which
you put forward.
-Gel
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Wheatley
We're not talking about gay adoption or procreation :> But yes i agree
they would die out but maybe this is part of gods plan to let the gays
exist? lol
We're talking about the right of 2 people to have equal rights.
William Wheatley
Coldfusion Guru
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
----- Original Message -----
From: Angel Stewart
Yes.
And Gay animals in the wild do not procreate, and are always in a
distinct minority.
The law of natural selection, God's law of natural selection if you
will,prevents this from proceeding any further in the wild.
If a particular species of animal in the wild were inclined to being
homosexual, that species would die out.
So what's that again about "God's Law" and "Animals in the wild" ?
-Gel
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
