You know - people can argue pro/con on this subject all day but I think most are missing the point.  It really boils down to whether it is a good or bad idea to legislate morality in the constitution and, obviously, it is not.  You can's legislate morality in the constitution as it would be completely contrary to other parts of the constitution.  The entire idea of a constitutional amendment to prohibit gay marriage is completely asinine.

Howie
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Angel Stewart
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 5:06 PM
  Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage

  Yes.

  And Gay animals in the wild do not procreate, and are always in a
  distinct minority.
  The law of natural selection, God's law of natural selection if you
  will,prevents this from proceeding any further in the wild.
  If a particular species of animal in the wild were inclined to being
  homosexual, that species would die out.
  So what's that again about "God's Law" and "Animals in the wild" ?

  -Gel

  -----Original Message-----
  From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  Its natural, in the wild there are gay animals. It means god did it for
  a reason so relax and realize its part of gods plan.

  William Wheatley
  Coldfusion Guru
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to