----- Original Message -----
From: Howie Hamlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 17:15:01 -0400
Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You know - people can argue pro/con on this subject all day but I
think most are missing the point. It really boils down to whether it
is a good or bad idea to legislate morality in the constitution and,
obviously, it is not. You can's legislate morality in the
constitution as it would be completely contrary to other parts of the
constitution. The entire idea of a constitutional amendment to
prohibit gay marriage is completely asinine.
Howie
----- Original Message -----
From: Angel Stewart
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 5:06 PM
Subject: RE: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
Yes.
And Gay animals in the wild do not procreate, and are always in a
distinct minority.
The law of natural selection, God's law of natural selection if you
will,prevents this from proceeding any further in the wild.
If a particular species of animal in the wild were inclined to being
homosexual, that species would die out.
So what's that again about "God's Law" and "Animals in the wild" ?
-Gel
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Its natural, in the wild there are gay animals. It means god did it for
a reason so relax and realize its part of gods plan.
William Wheatley
Coldfusion Guru________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
