1 - copies of some original documents (the originals are still in the archives)
2 - hand-written notes
Neither of these were supposed to be removed from the building. Berger took some of them out without permission. And, they were not stuffed into his socks.
All of this is right-wing smokescreening...sheesh
What he did was wrong, granted. But - the investigation started 7 months ago and if there was really something criminal he would have been charged by now.
----- Original Message -----
From: dana tierney
To: CF-Community
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: trousergate
::sigh:: according to CNN there are copies of what the man took. I
can't get too excited about this cause it just seems bizarre, like
there are major portions of the story missing.
As for absolving Clinton -- the 9/11 commission said today that this
unsupported opinion that Iraq and al-Qaeda were collaborating seems to
date back to his administration.
So my question to Rush would be this. Why cooperate with the
commission then send someone in to steal *copies* of documents? It
does not make sense.
Dana
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
