office memo, where people had added their own notes to each copy, so some
information could have been lost.
Marlon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2004 3:27 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: trousergate
>
> ok but if these were copies no real harm is done, right? Not that I
> say that it's all ok. A security breach is a security breach. They
> just shut down Los Alamos over something pretty similar.
>
> Dana
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: RE: trousergate
> To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --- Marwan Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry miniRush, but I don't buy that for a minute.
> hehehe... I'm flattered :)
>
> > They have been
> > investigating this for what, 9 months? I would think
> > that they knew EXACTLY
> > what Berger had in his possession, and what was and
> > was not returned. If
> > they don't know, then how do they know that he took
> > over 70 pages of file?
> > Heh, you debunked yourself...
> Not quite.
> They called him and said there were missing docs. He
> said I found some come pick them up. He returned about
> 50 docs. They didn't know he had that many.
> He claimed he accidentally threw some away. They have
> no idea how many he took the first time and how many
> weren't returned. From then on they marked the docs
> and only gave him copies. Then he took about 20 more.
>
> Read the Washington Post piece, it's all there.
>
> -sm
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!
> http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/__________
> ______________________
>
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
