ok but if these were copies no real harm is done, right? Not that I
say that it's all ok. A security breach is a security breach. They
just shut down Los Alamos over something pretty similar.

Dana

----- Original Message -----
From: Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: RE: trousergate
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

--- Marwan Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry miniRush, but I don't buy that for a minute.
hehehe... I'm flattered :)

> They have been
> investigating this for what, 9 months? I would think
> that they knew EXACTLY
> what Berger had in his possession, and what was and
> was not returned. If
> they don't know, then how do they know that he took
> over 70 pages of file?
> Heh, you debunked yourself...
Not quite.
They called him and said there were missing docs. He
said I found some come pick them up. He returned about
50 docs. They didn't know he had that many.
He claimed he accidentally threw some away. They have
no idea how many he took the first time and how many
weren't returned. From then on they marked the docs
and only gave him copies. Then he took about 20 more.

Read the Washington Post piece, it's all there.

-sm



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/yahoo/votelifeengine/________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to