> The documents in question were:
>
> 1 - copies of some original documents (the originals
> are still in the archives)
We don't know that for sure. We don't know what's
missing.
> 2 - hand-written notes
Not. He took over 70 pages of file.
>
> Neither of these were supposed to be removed from
> the building. Berger took some of them out without
> permission. And, they were not stuffed into his
> socks.
Still being debated.
>
> All of this is right-wing smokescreening...sheesh
>
> What he did was wrong, granted. But - the
> investigation started 7 months ago and if there was
> really something criminal he would have been charged
> by now.
If Condi did this she'd be in jail.
Why is it everytime someone connected to Clinton
breaks the law it's an honest mistake?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A4189-2004Jul21.html?nav=rss_nation
-sm
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: dana tierney
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 3:16 PM
> Subject: Re: trousergate
>
>
> ::sigh:: according to CNN there are copies of what
> the man took. I
> can't get too excited about this cause it just
> seems bizarre, like
> there are major portions of the story missing.
>
> As for absolving Clinton -- the 9/11 commission
> said today that this
> unsupported opinion that Iraq and al-Qaeda were
> collaborating seems to
> date back to his administration.
>
> So my question to Rush would be this. Why
> cooperate with the
> commission then send someone in to steal *copies*
> of documents? It
> does not make sense.
>
> Dana
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
