infecting someone with AIDS? Deception, perhaps. But is this really a
sex law or covered by other statutes, not sure.
----- Original Message -----
From: S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 19:39:17 -0400
Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Right -- though the qualification in my mind isn't really saying that
this is an exception to the rule of no laws governing sex between
adults, but rather that there are certain circumstances which are
inclusive of sex in addition to some form of violence which should be
punished. It's the violence that should be regulated, not the sex,
even though in the case of rape for instance the two are pretty
closely tied. But still -- I think we should make that distinction
especially in our laws between sex and violence and what it is that
we're punishing when we punish a rapist or other sex offender.
> true.
> I originally wrote the sentence without qualification and
> looked at
> it, though, and said well.. here are a few things I can
> think of that
> should be regulated :)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 18:07:17 -0400
> Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
> To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> In general I personally am against laws regulating the
>> sexual behavior
>> of adults with other adults. There will of course be
>> exceptions such
>> as rape or deliberate infection with AIDS.
> Both of which are violent crimes and therefore would be
> illegal for
> reasons entirely unrelated to sexual contact.
> s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
> new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
> add features without fixtures with
> the onTap open source framework
> http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1__________
> ______________________
>________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
