> In the interests of debate, answers inline...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Morris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 2:56 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: DNC
>
>
> --- Marwan Saidi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Not to mention winning a small international
> award.
> >
> >
> > The Nobel Peace Prize in 2002. Perhaps you've
> heard
> > of it Sam? Or did he
> > just get that for apologizing to everyone?
> You know damn well that was a slap at Bush for
> ousting
> Hussein.
>
> ? I know damn well what??
>
> > You know, if you would, just once, leave the
> > emotional ParrotRushSpeak out
> > of your posts and pretend, just for a minute, that
> > you have a thought in
> > your head that you formed on your own,
> Just can't stand the facts can you. You need to be
> able to spew your rubbish with out question. I'm
> amazed at how nasty people like you get when
> corrected.
>
> Nah, it's just that you can't comment on anything
> without taking it to the
> extreme. I just occasionally feel the need to bring
> you back down to
> Earth...
To the extreme? Thanks for the parachute.
>
> > you may get a
> > bit more respect on
> > this list (and in life in general).
> I have no respect for you and don't want your
> respect.
> I don't even know who the hell you are. You seem a
> bit
> too simple for my likings. Since you represent the
> entire list can you tell them I just have a
> different
> point of view than you? If nobody here respects me
> then I'm sorry for that, but every good debate needs
> two sides. I provide the other side.
>
> Fair enough. At least we can agree that we don't
> respect each other. The too
> simple bit is humorous though...
Simple in that you seem to only accept the DNC point
of view but then claim I'm parroting
Rush/O'Reilly/Fox.
> No, I don't
> represent the entire list, and
> I was presumptuous in speaking as if I did. For
> that, I apologize to the
> list. As far as your providing the "other side",
> let's look at your
> contribution to this thread:
I know what I wrote thank you.
> > Believe it or
> > not, the Democrats are
> > capable of good,
> I never said Democrats are not capable of good. I've
> even voted for a few in my time.
> Just don't like the big four, Clintons, Gore and
> Kerry.
>
> This comes from the fact that I can almost always
> predict which threads you
> will jump into and exactly what you will say,
> because I have heard/read it
> elsewhere.
Now you know I'm not making this up.
> And since I have never heard you say
> ANYTHING positive regarding
> the Democrats, well, therein lies the reason behind
> that statement.
As I said I don't like the main fab four and don't
remember other Dem's being discussed.
> > just as I know that there are folks
> > on the other side of
> > the aisle who have class and integrity. It's just
> so
> > hard to remain
> > objective in the face of right-wing detritus such
> as
> > that you so frequently
> > espouse. Trust me, to most it makes you look like
> a
> > blithering toon. Sorry,
> > that's just the way I feel.
>
> And why should I trust you?
> Everyday I read nonsense about how Bush is ruining
> the
> world and Iraq was the wrong country and the world
> hates us and Bush falls off his bike so he's an
> idiot.
> I just respond to the attacks. The attacks I read
> sound like blithering toons so I try to make
> correction.
>
> I guess we just see things from the opposite side of
> the fence. I think Bush
> (& company) _is_ ruining the perception of our
> country in the rest of the
> world (not just Germany and Russia, either).
Actually the Russians are more on our side according
to the Pew Poll.
? I think
> that the attack on Iraq
> was impulsive at best.
Two years in planning and over 10 years breaking UN
resolutions is hardly impulsive. But you're entitled
to your view.
> I do NOT think that we are
> safer today than we were
> prior to the war on Iraq.
We probably aren't but I don't think doing nothing
would have made us safer either. We'll get there, give
it time.
> Hell, my own sister is
> Republican and I can have
> debate with her because she doesn't resort to simply
> spouting what she hears
> on Fox, O'Reilly, Rush, et. al. She has even gotten
> me to see her side of
> things (on a few issues), as well as faults in the
> democrat position, so it
> can be done.
I can see why you don't like Rush and O'Reilly but why
Fox News? What news do you watch and trust?
> Sorry about the toon thing, but I had
> just had it.
np.
-sm
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
