No comments about the administration's stacking scientific advisory
committees, or the injection of ideology into review panels. How about
their declaration of increased scrutiny of grants that use the phrase
"gay" or "environmental" in the applications, or censoring submitted
articles to peer reviewed journals?

larry

On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 08:12:38 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We went over this already, how soon you forget.
> Let's try this again. Bookmark it this time.
>
> http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=m:5:13438:121325
>
> I did read it.
> And it defintly builds a wall.
>
> U.S. Attorney Mary Jo White was concerned that
> Gorelick's new guidelines for investigations had made
> it too complicated for the FBI to contact the U.S.
> attorney's office and launch a probe of suspicious
> activity. White suggested that only the Office of
> Intelligence Policy and Review at the Department of
> Justice needed to approve such an investigation, and
> not the department's criminal division.
>
> However, the Vatis/Gorelick memo offered a blunt
> reply.
>
> "I recommend rejecting this change," the June 19, 1995
>
> document stated. "[A] USAO (U.S. attorney's office)
> should not be notified of a national security
> investigation -- particularly one that has not yet
> developed into a criminal case -- without the approval
>
> of the AAG (assistant attorney general), Criminal
> Division."
>
> http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewSpecialReports.asp?Page=%5CSpecialReports%5
> Carchive%5C200404%5CSPE20040429b.html
>
> -sm
>
>
> --- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sam,
> >
> > About Gorelick. If you actually read the memo
> > instead of parrotting
> > the limpblob propanganda, you will notice that she
> > advocated lowering
> > the so-called walls between the various intelligence
> > communities. Also
> > it was a republican sponsored bill that was signed
> > by Bush Sr. that
> > established those walls in the first place.
> >
> > larry
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to