> i hate to put a damper on your logic as well, and i wont,
> since i just
> dont have the time or the fucking care to battle pointless
> points...really i dont.
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:19:37 -0400, S. Isaac Dealey
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > funny, ive NEVER had a problem either, maybe it was
>> > you?
>> > sorry, but maybe?
>>
>> > not that you would hijack yourself or anything like
>> > that,
>> > but maybe a
>> > shady dealer you dealt with?
>>
>> > all of these people having no problems, and i
>> > neither...would kinda
>> > point in the other direction, and not paypals?
>>
>> I hate to put a damper on your logic there pal, but lots
>> and lots of
>> people never ever have their credit cards scammed from
>> knuckle-busters
>> either. So are we now saying that for anyone who has it's
>> their fault
>> because they were asking for it by using a questionable
>> merchant? Is
>> it necessary for the merchant to be a questionable person
>> for them to
>> have an employee who steals? Likely people who steal from
>> the store
>> get hired to work at grocery and department stores all
>> the time --
>> doesn't stop me from shopping there.
>>
>> s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
>>
>> new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
>>
>> add features without fixtures with
>> the onTap open source framework
>> http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
>>
>>
>>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
