having the last word.
you win. im done with this one...
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 14:17:45 -0400, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then don't assume it's the victim's fault.
>
> > i hate to put a damper on your logic as well, and i wont,
> > since i just
> > dont have the time or the fucking care to battle pointless
> > points...really i dont.
>
> > On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:19:37 -0400, S. Isaac Dealey
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > funny, ive NEVER had a problem either, maybe it was
> >> > you?
> >> > sorry, but maybe?
> >>
> >> > not that you would hijack yourself or anything like
> >> > that,
> >> > but maybe a
> >> > shady dealer you dealt with?
> >>
> >> > all of these people having no problems, and i
> >> > neither...would kinda
> >> > point in the other direction, and not paypals?
> >>
> >> I hate to put a damper on your logic there pal, but lots
> >> and lots of
> >> people never ever have their credit cards scammed from
> >> knuckle-busters
> >> either. So are we now saying that for anyone who has it's
> >> their fault
> >> because they were asking for it by using a questionable
> >> merchant? Is
> >> it necessary for the merchant to be a questionable person
> >> for them to
> >> have an employee who steals? Likely people who steal from
> >> the store
> >> get hired to work at grocery and department stores all
> >> the time --
> >> doesn't stop me from shopping there.
> >>
> >> s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
> >>
> >> new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
> >>
> >> add features without fixtures with
> >> the onTap open source framework
> >> http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
