like crazy. Most of them are quick and dirty projects for internal use
so we don't spend a lot of design time on them. The larger ones are
usually design by committee, which makes for other problems. And while
I am a CSS advocate, I'm also my own worst enemy.
But here are a few things we work on:
http://www.uwex.edu/ces/ (planning a redesign)
http://www.uwex.edu/ces/personnel/
http://www.uwex.edu/ces/flp/
http://www.uwex.edu/ces/ag
http://www.midwestlandscapeplants.org *** really cool! ***
http://www.wisconsinvote.org
http://soybean.uwex.edu/
http://www.uwex.edu/ces/cced/readingroom/
http://www.uwex.edu/ces/wnep/index.cfm
http://www.uwex.edu/ces/tl21/
Most of those are things I did before learning much CSS. The only one
we've completely handed off is the Wisconsin Vote site, but the design
is still all my fault and I think the code is all Deanna's still.
There are tons more but they're really unexciting and/or they're
behind passwords.
For the most part, it's not glamorous stuff. But it's all about
helping people which is cool.
-Kevin
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:07:46 -0400, Erika L. Walker-Arnold
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So - I've done so many sites in the past year. MANY MANY sites ...
> And have always wanted to share them - but don't because of all you w3c
> validation and CSS snobs ;) :P (meant in a loving manner)
>
> Many of our sites have to be SO perfectly designed and to a customer
> explicit directions, that it's impossible for us to be 100% valid by w3c
> standards (we miss in the height attribute of a TD).
>
> And tableless designs? FORGET IT!
>
> Also - with so many sites to manage - we just don't have the time to be
> too particular. Most of the clients requirements are all current
> browsers - so as long as they work and can be navigated - they are
> happy.
>
> So how many others on here don't share their creations? :)
>
> Cheers,
> Erika
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
