majority of our stuff using CSS - I just DO NOT do tableless designs.
And I'll try that CSS on the height thing. That's the only thing keeping
us from HTML 4.01 compliancy on w3c.
I actually didn't realize it could be done. To be truthful - I didn't
look to see if I could specify height in CSS.
And I told you snob was meant in a loving manner :P
Someday next year - after all our new technology is polished off - we
might start dedicating some time to tableless designs. In the meantime -
gotta keep the roof over our head. :D
ALSO we rely heavily on ActivEdit's WYSIWYG for the customer's to update
their content - and that's about as compliant as a doorstop. Hopefully
by next year they will improve the code that thing generates.
On a related note - whilst our forms are accessible - many of our sites
need some work on the Bobby front. That's a project for later in the
year. That comes first, along with language versions, before we even
consider making a move on tableless designs.
Cheers,
Erika
>>| -----Original Message-----
>>| From: Sandy Clark
>>|
>>| Well most actually all my sites except for my blog are
>>| behind firewalls.
>>|
>>| I don't know whether I would call myself a snob, but I have
>>| made it a commitment to drag all my cf family into the 21st
>>| century via web standards, css and accessibility which is
>>| why I nag you all so much.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
