-----Original Message-----
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 1:34 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: FW: Another Bush campaign worker acknowleges links to Swift
Boat Veterans for Truth
Still its a more nuanced response than the definition of IS.
larry
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:41:14 -0500, Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *shrug*
>
> That's lawyering for you. It's a conflict of interest for the lawyer
> to work for both the Kerry and Bush campains, but it's not collusion
> for the lawyer to work with two separate parties both attacking the
> same target. To show collusion you'd need something like a memo or
> sworn testimony that the lawyer was improperly sharing information
> between the clients.
>
> -Kevin
>
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 08:28:40 -0400, Larry C. Lyons
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And there was no coordination between the campaign and that 527 group?
> >
> > larry
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
