> And it was I who copied the text book definition of
> "terrorism" in a post last week, a definition that many
> people thought was nuts...and yet i haven't seen a better
> one.
It's not the definition I thought was nuts. What I thought was nuts
was the idea that you could (or would want to) suspend any law on the
grounds of any definition of terrorism, dictionary or otherwise. I
suspect that's the case for others who responded as well.
s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
http://www.fusiontap.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
