> It may be an attempt to support the view that the
> Bushes were bought
> and paid for by the Sauds, ie the link is more
> personal if authorized
> by Bush. I am not sure why there is this controversy
> either. "House of
> Bush House of Saud" does not assert this, btw; it
> talks about the
> Saudi ambassador and the FBI, while leaving the link
> between the two
> to the imagination.
So why talk about it unless you want to have us
believe there is a link?
> I personally think it *should* have been Bush, if
> such flights were
> authorized. But on second though it is not all that
> incredible that he
> would not have known. This is a man who seems to
> thrive on ignoring
> the small stuff. And the big stuff. And the really
> really big stuff
> <G> I'll shut up now.
So now he needs to micro-manage the country? That's a
sign of poor leadership.
> Somebody here was arguing earlier that these flights
> were actually
> taking place after the airspace opened. Whoever it
> was does not seem
> to be disputing the issue now.
That was I, and there�s no point, if the flights did
take place before the 14th they would have been
domestic flights not international. Even if they were
international IT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH BUSH.
-sm
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
