I find it amusing that you would chastise Sam for his  "(thinking) that
calling people liars is an
answer to everything" while defending your argument by calling Clark a liar.

dana tierney wrote:

> uh... why should I believe Clark? His veracity has been questioned,
> right? Who ELSE says?
>
> geez, the things you have to explain :)
>
> Dana
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to