of calling him a liar. And a wimp and a few other things. They don't
seem to need my help. I have no opinion on whether the man is a liar
or not :) I lean to not, but... I really don't know. Have not looked
into it. Don't have time right now. I would have thought Sam would
think Clark was a liar, but you never know. He thinks he is a centrist
:) Therefore I as someone else who thinks she is a centrist *should*
be able to agree with him on something :) Lord knows I keep trying :)
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Stoner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 14:38:34 -0400
Subject: Re: house of bush, house of saud
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I find it amusing that you would chastise Sam for his "(thinking) that
calling people liars is an
answer to everything" while defending your argument by calling Clark a liar.
dana tierney wrote:
> uh... why should I believe Clark? His veracity has been questioned,
> right? Who ELSE says?
>
> geez, the things you have to explain :)
>
> Dana________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
