think to put some objective clarity to this...
angel, its insulting for one REALLY big reason in my head...
and here it is..
to purport, for one instance of a nano second that there would be any,
and i mean any shadow of a doubt, the authenticity of the facts stated
by the pentagon on this, and only this, topic...is nearly jesus-era
blasphemy. honestly. and thats all.
i, as a very GOVT. weary american, HAVE to question most
things...however, this one, that day, nothing was more REAL than that.
NOTHING. im sure it affected EVERYONE on this list, in some way
shape or form, and id never discount that affect. cause i still feel
it today.
its almost like an open wound that still hurts, and every time a
conspiracy theory comes up about AMERICANS FUCKING DYING and that
being part of a big lie, is just like alcohol to the wound. thats as
plain as i can put it...now this is my perspective and may not be that
of anyones on the list, but...thats why its insulting to me.
tony
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 00:21:52 -0400, Angel Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh come on. To see it that way is a further stretch than a missile
> hitting the pentagon.
> That is in no way what I meant. In fact the question of 'what happened
> to the flight'
> is one of the key failing points of any other explanation.
>
> And yes I see now where you're coming from.Any questions about any
> tragedy.
> Take Colombine for instance could be seen as 'insulting' if you really
> want to see it that way.
> But does that mean no one should ask questions? Does that mean people
> can't theorise and ask 'what if' ?
> No it does not.
> I pointed out in a previous post the amount of useful analysis that has
> resulted from people questioning the events around 9/11.
> The whole question of 'could it have been a missile' has been asked by
> reporters more than once, and answered.
> I mean good grief, America had an entire committee to explore what
> happened on 9/11.
> Go tell them that any questions they might have raised as to who
> hijacked the aircraft, how it happened,
> and whether there was any collusion with American Authorities was
> insulting to everyone involved.
>
> Some seem to be missing /that/ point, whether through choice or
> ignorance I don't know.
>
> Now do you see why I don't think it insulting?
>
> -Gel
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Vernon
>
> You somehow seem to be missing the point everyone else seems to be
> making.
>
> Whether this is through choice or ignorance I don't know....
>
> Now do you see why it could be construed as insulting?
>
> Paul
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
