superscript and the proportional font is troubling, yup, but Dan
Rather is very firmly standing by the story, so I am going to wait and
see what develops on this one . CNN pointed out too that the White
House is not denying the *content* of the documents. Maybe this is a
case like the fabricated photos of Brits abusing Iraqis... ie it
happened but someone also made up documents to "prove" that it
happened?
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:33:32 -0400
Subject: Re: More of Bush being AWOL
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ha, thought i was the one confused for a minute. CNS is not CBS is it?
>
>Dana
<blush>
whoops.... hehe
</blush>
Still, the report that the docs are forgeries is turning out to be
true. Now ABC is (probably gleefully) reporting the same story:
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/Politics/Vote2004/bush_documents_040909-1.html
I'm pretty sure that this one is actually ABC News.
Apparently CBS has an investigation ongoing into the documents and Dan
Rather may actually issue an on-air correction if this all turns out
to be a bogus story.________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
