itself shows impact? Having used typewriters in those days, paper does show
the impact of having keys hit the paper, something that modern laser and ink
jet printers do not.
Sandy Clark
http://www.shayna.com <http://www.shayna.com/>
CF Pretty Accessible at http://www.shayna.com/blog
Now offering 4 days Hands on CSS training October 11-14th. Rockville, MD.
For more information go to:
http://www.teratech.com/training/oc_classes.cfm#css
_____
From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2004 3:14 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: More of Bush being AWOL
Matter, of fact, I have seen it elsewhere now too. The point with the
superscript and the proportional font is troubling, yup, but Dan
Rather is very firmly standing by the story, so I am going to wait and
see what develops on this one . CNN pointed out too that the White
House is not denying the *content* of the documents. Maybe this is a
case like the fabricated photos of Brits abusing Iraqis... ie it
happened but someone also made up documents to "prove" that it
happened?
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 01:33:32 -0400
Subject: Re: More of Bush being AWOL
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ha, thought i was the one confused for a minute. CNS is not CBS is it?
>
>Dana
<blush>
whoops.... hehe
</blush>
Still, the report that the docs are forgeries is turning out to be
true. Now ABC is (probably gleefully) reporting the same story:
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/Politics/Vote2004/bush_documents_040909-1.htm
l
I'm pretty sure that this one is actually ABC News.
Apparently CBS has an investigation ongoing into the documents and Dan
Rather may actually issue an on-air correction if this all turns out
to be a bogus story.________________________________
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
