the difference, Andy, is that Bush was president and therefore was
responsible for the corporate culture of the CIA in his
administration. The buck stops here and all that. Kerry was a private
citizen at the time of his testimony and merely reported what he had
been told.

Dana

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:29:44 -0500, Andy Ousterhout
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Give that man a silver dollar!  If one wishes to hold Bush responsible for
> what he read and did, then the same should be applied to Kerry.  Saying it
> is
> not Kerry's responsibility because a) he didn't write it and b) it was
> congress' job to decide what is truth is working hard to avoid the realty of
> the man.
>
> Andy
>
>
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:18 PM
>   To: CF-Community
>   Subject: Re: Kerry's Testimony
>
>   Is that a joke?  Isn't that exactly what happened with the State of the
> Union speech and all the other rhetoric involving WMDs in Iraq?
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     From: Andy Ousterhout
>     To: CF-Community
>     Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:12 PM
>     Subject: RE: Kerry's Testimony
>
>     With your logic, a president could read a report from someone to the
> public and not
>     be held responsible for it.________________________________
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to