hmm. Supposing you are right. Supposing I am John Kerry in 1971/72.
Someone tells me that five years ago in a country thousands of miles
away, currently in a state of war, he committed atrocities. Exactly
how would I, as a private citizen, go about verifying this?

Dana

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:55:56 -0500, G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bah, thats a load of whooey.
>
> Whether you are impelled to or not, citing something that you've heard
> without verifying it's authenticity is just plain irresponsible and wrong.
> It's one of the reasons those dang chain emails annoy me so much.
>
> If Kerry heard first hand stories from soldiers of atrocities, accounts that
> he believes are true based upon the trustworthiness of the source, then when
> he relays that story to Congress he is stating them as if he believes them
> to be accurate.  
>
> If it turns out that Kerry's sources lied to him, even though he had every
> reason to believe they didn't, he'd be guilty of the same mistake Bush made.
>  Saying he has no obligation as to the truthfulness of stories he is
> recounting, is to forgive George Bush of the very same thing. I don't care
> if he's talking to Congress, or a kindergarten class.
>
> When Bush relayed the British WMD intel, he believed it. I sure hope Kerry
> believed what he was recounting in that testimony, because it speaks worse
> of him if he didn't, wrong or otherwise.
>
> ugh, sorry for the long post.....Brian
>
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Gruss Gott
>   To: CF-Community
>   Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:43 PM
>   Subject: Re: Kerry's Testimony
>
>   > Andy wrote:
>   > If one wishes to hold Bush responsible for ... the same should be
> applied to Kerry.
>
>   You're wrong.  Here's why:
>
>   Mr. Bush is acting as the President of the United States; he acts in
>   the same capacity as Congress in the example of Mr. Kerry's testimony.
>   If Mr. Bush, or congress, feels something needs to be investigated,
>   then they investigate it.
>
>   Mr. Kerry, on the other hand, was acting in the capacity of a
>   character/professional witness.  His job was only to provide
>   information based on questions from the investigators; not to conduct
>   an investigation.  That's congress' or the President's
> job.________________________________
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to