3 is possibly true, but how would he have known either way? he did not have the federal government at his disposal, is all I am saying. And remember, this was not long after My Lai I think, which would have made such allegations seem very credible.
Dana On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:22:57 -0500, Andy Ousterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Actually Dana, > > I don't even remember how this came to be a topic of discussion. I just got > caught up in the double standard. > > It is only important as an indicator of Kerry's character if: > 1. He is denying he said that > 2. He lied in what he said > 3. He was wrong in what he said because he did not research the statements > > Outside of that, I could care less. And at this point, I don't see any of > 1-3 being true. > > Andy > > -----Original Message----- > From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 6:10 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Kerry's Testimony > > what if he did believe it? Don't you think that this would be > something it was important to bring to people's attention? > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:03:00 -0500, Andy Ousterhout > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dana: > > I have no probably holding Bush responsible. I also hold Kerry > responsible. > > No excuses. If he didn't believe it, he shouldn't have said it. If he > did > > believe it, then he should be willing to stand buy it. > > > > Andy > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 4:57 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Kerry's Testimony > > > > the difference, Andy, is that Bush was president and therefore was > > responsible for the corporate culture of the CIA in his > > administration. The buck stops here and all that. Kerry was a private > > citizen at the time of his testimony and merely reported what he had > > been told. > > > > Dana > > > > On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:29:44 -0500, Andy Ousterhout > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Give that man a silver dollar! If one wishes to hold Bush responsible > for > > > what he read and did, then the same should be applied to Kerry. Saying > it > > > is > > > not Kerry's responsibility because a) he didn't write it and b) it was > > > congress' job to decide what is truth is working hard to avoid the > realty > > of > > > the man. > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 2:18 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: Re: Kerry's Testimony > > > > > > Is that a joke? Isn't that exactly what happened with the State of > the > > > Union speech and all the other rhetoric involving WMDs in Iraq? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Andy Ousterhout > > > To: CF-Community > > > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 3:12 PM > > > Subject: RE: Kerry's Testimony > > > > > > With your logic, a president could read a report from someone to > the > > > public and not > > > be held responsible for it. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Sams Teach Yourself Regular Expressions in 10 Minutes by Ben Forta http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=40 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:131558 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
