> Brian wrote: > DELIBERATE....targetting of civilians. Are you implying US soldiers are > purposefully shooting women and children? > > What are your sources on this? I've seen nothing describing the kinds of > scenes you are painting.
Michael made some good points in his last post, but I can't get past this point: If my neighbor and his family forcefully took over part of my house, wouldn't they all be targets as they are all occupiers? Basically, who's the "enemy"? In the end, aren't you just arguing that some killing is ok, but other killing isn't, and isn't this the same as the outrage the British had towards America during the Revolutionary War when they were picking off the British before the lined up in the field of battle? It seems like we're trying to define a "fair fight" which seems to be an oxymoron. Wouldn't both sides be willing to stop the killing faster if the new rule was that if you start a war in the name of your people, all of the people are a target? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:135746 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
