I have to learn to write in English, or proof my remarks first.

I meant to say 
As far as I understand, the article is saying that the effect for
districts with electronic voting showed a greater likelihood for
voting for bush beyond what could be normally expected.

larry

On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:20:08 -0500, Larry C. Lyons
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as I understand, its saying that the effect that districts with
> electronic voting showed a greater likelihood for voting for bush
> beyond what could be normally expected. If this can be confirmed then
> that to me say that there may be something  to the accusations of
> fraud.   I am very familiar with the sort of analysis they used, if it
> can be independently confirmed then this could be a smoking gun. I've
> been too busy with work related stuff to do a real analysis, but if
> someone to point me to the actual data - preferably in some sort of
> readable format I'll redo their analyes and post it here.
> 
> Doesn't Dana's sig mention something about Diebold being the best way
> to deliver a state. This may be an example.
> 
> larry
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:49:27 -0600, Marlon Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "As baseline support for Bush increases in Florida counties, the
> > change in percent voting for Bush from 2000 to 2004 increases, but at a
> > decreasing rate. Electronic voting has a main, positive effect on the
> > dependent variable. Furthermore, there is an interaction effect between
> > baseline support for Bush and electronic voting, and between baseline
> > support for Bush squared and electronic voting. Support for Dole in
> > 1996, county size, median income, and Hispanic population had no
> > significant effect net of the other effects. Essentially, net of other
> > effects, electronic voting had the greatest positive effect on change
> > in percent voting for Bush from 2"
> >
> > So are you saying that only people that were affected by the hurricane did
> > electronic voting.  This article states that the hurricanes did have a
> > positive effect on the voting, but not as positive as electronic voting
> > machines.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 3:38 PM
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Subject: RE: Problems with votes in Florida
> > >
> > > You know, I kinda thought the hurricanes would greatly help Bush in
> > > Florida,
> > > he was there in times of need and was sending money to help the
> > > victims.
> > >
> > > He also opened the oil reserves to offset the effects the Hurricanes had
> > > on
> > > the oil supply, which greatly affects that area. Seems pretty obvious to
> > > me
> > > how he won.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 4:11 PM
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Subject: RE: Problems with votes in Florida
> > >
> > > Lies, damn lies and statistics....
> > >
> > > Russel Madere
> > > Webmaster
> > > 504.832.9835
> > > SunShine Pages by EATEL
> > > www.sunshinepages.com
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 3:03 PM
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Subject: Problems with votes in Florida
> > >
> > > Researchers at UC Berkeley <http://www.berkeley.edu/>  have
> > > crunched
> > > numbers
> > > and determined that 130,000-260,000 excess votes went to Bush in
> > > Florida.
> > > They have held a conference
> > > <http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/041118/sfth040_1.html>  and posted their
> > > <http://ucdata.berkeley.edu/new_web/VOTE2004/index.html>  findings
> > > online.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/19/1754249&from=rss
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net
http://www.cfhosting.net

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:137225
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to