Well, just for fun, I'm going to put in a little question, what if the electronic machines are the correct numbers, and that non-electronic votes are the fraudulent ones.
I don't know the answer, and I do think this is odd, however I haven't read the full study, so once I do that I will be able to discus this better. -----Original Message----- From: Marlon Moyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 4:49 PM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Problems with votes in Florida "As baseline support for Bush increases in Florida counties, the change in percent voting for Bush from 2000 to 2004 increases, but at a decreasing rate. Electronic voting has a main, positive effect on the dependent variable. Furthermore, there is an interaction effect between baseline support for Bush and electronic voting, and between baseline support for Bush squared and electronic voting. Support for Dole in 1996, county size, median income, and Hispanic population had no significant effect net of the other effects. Essentially, net of other effects, electronic voting had the greatest positive effect on change in percent voting for Bush from 2" So are you saying that only people that were affected by the hurricane did electronic voting. This article states that the hurricanes did have a positive effect on the voting, but not as positive as electronic voting machines. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:137227 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
