And you didn't see 1% of what the jury saw. Your vindication of him is based on media reports, while their indicment of him is based on arduous deliberation of the facts. I simply don't see how you can be so sure that you are right, and they are wrong.
>I don't see they proved anything beyond the reasonable doubt that he was >responsible. > > They removed the last juror because he would not go along with the guilty > verdict, and replaced him with someone who was sitting > there never paying attention or even taking notes. The previous juror they > removed also had stated during the trial that he thought > Peterson was innocent and questioned the 'evidence'. Over 30 character > witnesses said that Peterson was a great guy who wouldn't do > something like this, but the prosecution said that's just because he was > so very manipulative. > > Remind me to bring that argument next time something good is said about > someone I dislike. Mother Theresa wasn't good, you've all > been had! She's just manipulative, it's all an act! *smirk* > > -Gel > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:139753 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
