You are correct, but I don't know of any official word saying it was believed to be from Iraq. I know I saw it on the cover of the national inquirer when I was at Kroger, but I don't think that is the news.
I am not saying people aren't going to die. I am saying we have created technology that we can use to keep loss of live to a minimum. Why not use it first. How do you mean WWI and WWII were found un-Constitutional? At 10:13 AM 11/2/2001 -0600, you wrote: >There is zero evidence this is from Iraq. Just more smoke and mirrors from >Washington. These people don't know shit. We (or some of you) elected a >bunch of guys interested in lining their pockets with oil money, business >men who wanted control of the government for that purpose, to make a better >business environment for themselves, not governing a country for the people. >Look at who is there and where they come from. > >This whole thing has them perplexed. Now the spin machine starts up. Who can >we demonize? Who is the enemy? What got here? People always say you can't >look back, only you can and you should. We are going to repeat this again >and again if we do not look back and learn. > >We interred people in WWI, WWII and both were found to be unconstitutional >later. Why is it okay to do it again? > >Sheesh people. Great idea, let's start lobbing around nukes and fuel air >bombs, that's the ticket. Like the life 98% of Afghani's live isn't horrible >now. Is it genocide we want? Will that solve this problem? What variable are >we missing? > >If we want to fight a war, people are going to die - our people. We have >spent so much time and money trying to sanitize warfare with smart weapons >and the reality is it is a dirty, messy business. Russia found that out. I >hope we are talking to and learning from them. Mountain warfare is very >tough. > >-Gary > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lon Lentz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:20 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: How long? > > > > > > > > Wow, I guess I'm glad that your sentiment wasn't the majority in WWII. > > Who knows where we would have given up? Did you know that Ike was > > sitting on retreat orders for the guys on the beaches of northern France > > at about 9am that morning? > > > > As to Iraq: We have had a national defense policy for decades of > > meeting strategic weapons with strategic weapons. Anthrax is a > > biological strategic weapon. And we have only one strategic weapon at > > our disposal, nuclear. If Baghdad turns out to be the source of the > > Anthrax from which we are suffering, there will only be one bomb. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 9:51 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: How long? > > > > > > How long does it take a Superpower to bomb a third-world country into > > submission? We've been bombing Afghanistan since Oct 7 - I > > would have thought it would be over by now. Here it is, November 2, and > > we don't seem any closer to an end. What concerns me is > > that there are some who think that Iraq may have been involved and may > > be the target of the next campaign. Iraq has a much better > > military than Afghanistan so how long would that one take? And, a > > campaign against Iraq would be completely different that the Gulf > > war because we wouldn't stop short of going into Baghdad this time. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
