You say science like it's a person. It's not. We're talking about those who present science; those who teach it and speak of it. I've heard the 'how can you be religious' argument a few times by people, not by science. Science doesn't care. If its speakers were divorced from the presenting of facts then it might be more palatable to the 'bible nutz'. My brother taught science in a Yeshiva. He had no problem doing so in a place where God's creation of the world is presented as fact. There are few (if any) yeshivas where science would not be taught because it may go against 'creationism'. The problem is people. The problem is always people.
> I also think you're wrong about how science presents Dieism. Generally > from what I've read in the debate your characterization of science > being atheistic and determined to force atheism down everyone's > throats is completely incorrect. If anything its a common method used > by the creatinist pardon creationist side to attack modern science. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - New Atlanta http://www.newatlanta.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:140061 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
