If that were the case, it seems like there would have been some huge quakes right in that region soon after the intense allied bombing of Tokyo, etc. (not to mention the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki) at the end of World War II. Of course, maybe there were?
Regardless, if conventional (or unconventional) bombing were more directly responsible for quakes and tsunamis, there would have been decades of unfettered devastation in the Pacific along the Ring of Fire with all the nuclear testing back during the height of the Cold War in the various atolls in the area. - Jim Tony Weeg wrote: >all the bombs that the USA has thrown at the mid eastern region (iraq >and afghanistan) > >tw > > >On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:37:38 -0400, Angel Stewart ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Errr..what are you talking about? >> >>What bombs?? >> >>-Gel >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>and again i say, if you lob a large enough arsenal of bombs, VERY strong >>bombs at that, the strongest bombs that history has ever >>seen, at concentrated areas, for any amount of time, you have to imagine that >>there has to be some sort of tectonic effect... doesnt >>there seem to have to be some sort of impact? >> >>tony >> >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:141021 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
