i guess... just an idea...
tw On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 09:26:16 -0600, Jim Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If that were the case, it seems like there would have been some huge > quakes right in that region soon after the intense allied bombing of > Tokyo, etc. (not to mention the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and > Nagasaki) at the end of World War II. Of course, maybe there were? > > Regardless, if conventional (or unconventional) bombing were more > directly responsible for quakes and tsunamis, there would have been > decades of unfettered devastation in the Pacific along the Ring of Fire > with all the nuclear testing back during the height of the Cold War in > the various atolls in the area. > > - Jim > > Tony Weeg wrote: > > >all the bombs that the USA has thrown at the mid eastern region (iraq > >and afghanistan) > > > >tw > > > > > >On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 22:37:38 -0400, Angel Stewart > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >>Errr..what are you talking about? > >> > >>What bombs?? > >> > >>-Gel > >> > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >>and again i say, if you lob a large enough arsenal of bombs, VERY strong > >>bombs at that, the strongest bombs that history has ever > >>seen, at concentrated areas, for any amount of time, you have to imagine > >>that there has to be some sort of tectonic effect... doesnt > >>there seem to have to be some sort of impact? > >> > >>tony > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:141022 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
