Riiiiight. Just the cash please. And yes, the Israeli medical staff would make a great difference as they have some of the best trauma teams in the world. They have mobile hospitals that can be set up where the people need it rather than waiting to get the people to some other location. They have hands on experience dealing with just about every injury that you can imagine. Remember that we're talking blunt trauma from the force of the waves/objects, impale wounds from debris, etc. Being shot at and bombed all the time has led to some powerfully trained medical staff. Not many other countries have doctors with such hands on experience.
But the politicians have spoken. "give us the supplies, not your people" > They did not reject all the aid, they rejected the personnel. They are > accepting the physical medical supplies and other supplies > from Israel is what I read. > > 'at the expense of their people'. > Would the Israeli medical staff really have made such a difference to Sri > Lanka when compared to the aid from other sources? > Yes it's a snub, but I really don't think it's 'at the expense of their > people'. > > -Gel > > > -----Original Message----- > From: G > > Terrible analogy because it's not even remotely close to the same > situation. > > If the Sri Lankans "see it that way" as you put it, then they are so > incredibly delusional its ridiculous. I don't see how you can > possibly defend this as logical thinking. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:141056 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
